Self & Society

Please make sure to purchase $20 food or drink at the restaurant.

It's National Donut Day, so here's a question physicists genuinely take seriously: the universe might actually be donut-shaped.
Not a joke. We're fairly sure the observable universe is flat, but we honestly don't know whether it's finite or infinite — or whether it loops back on itself like a torus.

The science (it's real)
Here's the mind-bender: a donut surface is flat in the geometric sense, even though it looks curved. The 3D version is called a torus — and a torus-shaped universe would be flat and finite.
That breaks our intuition. "Flat" doesn't have to mean "infinite." Space could be finite and have no edge — travel far enough in one direction and you'd return to where you started, like the old Asteroids video game.
How would we ever know? Look for a "hall of mirrors." If the universe is finite, light could wrap around it, so a distant galaxy might really be a repeated image of a nearby one.

Cosmologists hunt for this as matched patterns in the leftover glow of the Big Bang (the cosmic microwave background).
So far, no clear repeats — which mostly means that if it's a torus, it's so large that the light hasn't had time to circle back yet. But it's not ruled out: a 2024 team modeling a donut-shaped universe found it could even explain why the CMB is oddly missing its largest-scale ripples.

The philosophy (where it gets good)

• Can you ever know the shape of something you can't step outside of? We're stuck inside the universe. It's like a flat creature on a donut's surface trying to deduce its whole world without ever leaving it.
• Finite but endless. A space with no boundary that you could still circle in a lifetime — what does "the edge of the universe" even mean, then?
• Is "far away" real, or an echo? In a hall of mirrors, the distant might just be the near, seen again.
• A wink back to last idea: a torus has a hole. If the cosmos is a torus — does the universe have a hole? And where would it be?

Questions for the room

• If space loops back on itself, is it really "finite" — or just cleverly endless?
• Could there be facts about reality we can never access, simply because of where we're standing?
• Does it change anything about how you feel, to imagine living inside a shape rather than an endless void?

Please purchase $20 in food or drink or treat other attendees.

Please make sure to purchase $20 food or drink at the restaurant.

AI now predicts the future from mountains of data.
But its forecasts only ever describe a future that resembles the past — it extends patterns that already exist.
The genuinely new — whatever isn't in any dataset yet — stays out of reach.
So the question: have we started trusting the measurable forecast so much that we quietly undervalue what only humans can sense?

Example: the Forward Deployed Engineer (FDE)
An FDE embeds deep in a customer's world, working alongside them.
They talk directly with people across departments — sales, support, finance.
Then they gather scattered, seemingly unrelated voices and shape them into a single insight: "here's the real problem." Before solving anything, they frame the question itself.
What they pick up is firsthand, ground-level information — the raw signal no metric can capture.

How an FDE actually gathers it
The real skill isn't collecting what's spoken. It's collecting what isn't.

• The gap between what people say and what they do — "no problems here," while quietly running a private spreadsheet because the real system fails them.
• Tone, hesitation, a sigh before opening a too.— pain that never gets filed as a complaint.
• The silences — the workaround nobody names, the person not invited to the meeting.
• The emotional temperature of a team — gut feeling, fear of blame, frustration.

Where humans and AI differ
AI connects things that sit statistically near each other.
Humans leap across things with no measurable link at all — an answer arriving from an unrelated place.

Questions for the room

• When has a clean number told you the wrong story?
• What does AI systematically miss — and who notices?
• Do we truly value the human ability to connect the unrelated narratives?

What's measured isn't everything.